Hi, I was diagnosed with UC about 5 years ago, at 45 years old. Not really received much support or advice from specialist. I suppose my UC is mild, with only one hospitalisation in that time.
I've been a bit confused lately with one aspect. My specialist told me a year or so ago, at our last meeting, that when I turned 50 and got my bowel screening test, it'd show up as abnormal and be flagged for follow-up (ie a colonoscopy most likely). However, I had the result of my screening this week and it has shown my sample as perfectly normal and requiring no further action. Now, obviously that's good from a bowel cancer point of view, but I'm a bit confused why my UC did not flag my sample as requiring investigation. Is it just that it's not 'active' at the moment and didn't show up? Or was my specialist mistaken last year when he said IBD will show up on a bowel screening test?
Anyone know?